Paper detail

Credence: Augmenting Datacenter Switch Buffer Sharing with ML Predictions

Packet buffers in datacenter switches are shared across all the switch ports in order to improve the overall throughput. The trend of shrinking buffer sizes in datacenter switches makes buffer sharing extremely challenging and a critical performance issue. Literature suggests that push-out buffer sharing algorithms have significantly better performance guarantees compared to drop-tail algorithms. Unfortunately, switches are unable to benefit from these algorithms due to lack of support for push-out operations in hardware. Our key observation is that drop-tail buffers can emulate push-out buffers if the future packet arrivals are known ahead of time. This suggests that augmenting drop-tail algorithms with predictions about the future arrivals has the potential to significantly improve performance. This paper is the first research attempt in this direction. We propose Credence, a drop-tail buffer sharing algorithm augmented with machine-learned predictions. Credence can unlock the performance only attainable by push-out algorithms so far. Its performance hinges on the accuracy of predictions. Specifically, Credence achieves near-optimal performance of the best known push-out algorithm LQD (Longest Queue Drop) with perfect predictions, but gracefully degrades to the performance of the simplest drop-tail algorithm Complete Sharing when the prediction error gets arbitrarily worse. Our evaluations show that Credence improves throughput by $1.5$x compared to traditional approaches. In terms of flow completion times, we show that Credence improves upon the state-of-the-art approaches by up to $95\%$ using off-the-shelf machine learning techniques that are also practical in today's hardware. We believe this work opens several interesting future work opportunities both in systems and theory that we discuss at the end of this paper.

preprint2024arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.