Paper detail

$CP$-violating observables in four-body $B\rightarrow ϕ(\rightarrow K\bar K)K^*(\rightarrow Kπ)$ decays

We analyse the four-body $B\rightarrow ϕ(\rightarrow K\bar K)K^*(\rightarrow Kπ)$ decays in the perturbative QCD approach,where the invariant mass of $K\bar K$($Kπ$) system is limited in a window of $\pm 15$ MeV ($\pm150$ MeV) around the $ϕ(K^*(892))$ mass.In addition to the P wave resonances,two important S wave backgrounds in the selected invariant mass region are also accounted for. Angular momentum conservation allows six helicity amplitudes to contribute,including three P waves, two single S waves,and one double S wave. We calculated the branching ratio for each component and found sizable S wave contributions,coincide with the experimental observation.The obtained branching ratios of $B^{0(+)}\rightarrow ϕK^{*0(+)}$ are comparable with the previous predictions and support the measurements, whereas the predicted $\mathcal{B}(B^0_s\rightarrow ϕ\bar K^{*0})$ is smaller than the world average. The longitudinal polarizations are predicted to be around 0.7,consistent with previous PQCD results but larger than the data. Aside from the direct CP asymmetries,the true and fake triple product asymmetries(TPAs) are calculated in this work. In the case of neutral modes, both direct CP asymmetries and true TPAs are expected to be zero due to the vanishing weak phase difference. The direct CP asymmetries for the $B^+$ mode are predicted to be tiny,since the tree contributions are suppressed with respect to the penguin ones. The true asymmetries have shown no significant deviations from zero.In contrast,large fake asymmetries are observed in these decays,indicating the presence of significant final state interactions.We give the predictions of the S wave induced TPAs for the first time,which is consistent with LHCb data and would be checked with future measurements from Belle and BABAR experiments if the S wave components can be properly taken into account in angular analysis.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.