Coverings with horo- and hyperballs generated by simply truncated orthoschemes

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Abstract

After having investigated the packings derived by horo- and hyperballs related to simple frustum Coxeter orthoscheme tilings we consider the corresponding covering problems (briefly hyp-hor coverings) in nn-dimensional hyperbolic spaces Hn\mathbb{H}^n (n=2,3n=2,3). We construct in the 2−2- and 3−3-dimensional hyperbolic spaces hyp-hor coverings that are generated by simply truncated Coxeter orthocheme tilings and we determine their thinnest covering configurations and their densities. We prove that in the hyperbolic plane (n=2n=2) the density of the above thinnest hyp-hor covering arbitrarily approximate the universal lower bound of the hypercycle or horocycle covering density 12π\frac{\sqrt{12}}π and in H3\mathbb{H}^3 the optimal configuration belongs to the {7,3,6}\{7,3,6\} Coxeter tiling with density ≈1.27297\approx 1.27297 that is less than the previously known famous horosphere covering density 1.2801.280 due to L.~Fejes Tóth and K.~Böröczky. Moreover, we study the hyp-hor coverings in truncated orthosche\-mes {p,3,6}\{p,3,6\} (6<p<7, p∈R)(6< p < 7, ~ p\in \mathbb{R}) whose density function attains its minimum at parameter p≈6.45962p\approx 6.45962 with density ≈1.26885\approx 1.26885. That means that this locally optimal hyp-hor configuration provide smaller covering density than the former determined ≈1.27297\approx 1.27297 but this hyp-hor packing configuration can not be extended to the entirety of hyperbolic space H3\mathbb{H}^3.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.