Paper detail

Covalency and vibronic couplings make a nonmagnetic j=3/2 ion magnetic

For 4$d^1$ and 5$d^1$ spin-orbit-coupled electron configurations, the notion of nonmagnetic j=3/2 quartet ground state discussed in classical textbooks is at odds with the observed variety of magnetic properties. Here we throw fresh light on the electronic structure of 4$d^1$ and 5$d^1$ ions in molybdenum- and osmium-based double-perovskite systems and reveal different kinds of on-site many-body physics in the two families of compounds: while the sizable magnetic moments and $g$ factors measured experimentally are due to both metal $d$-ligand $p$ hybridization and dynamic Jahn-Teller interactions for 4$d$ electrons, it is essentially $d$-$p$ covalency for the 5$d^1$ configuration. These results highlight the subtle interplay of spin-orbit interactions, covalency and electron-lattice couplings as the major factor in deciding the nature of the magnetic ground states of 4$d$ and 5$d$ quantum materials. Cation charge imbalance in the double-perovskite structure is further shown to allow a fine tuning of the gap between the $t_{2g}$ and $e_g$ levels, an effect of much potential in the context of orbital engineering in oxide electronics.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.