Paper detail

Coupling between Phonon-Phonon and Phonon-Impurity Scattering: A Critical Revisit of the Spectral Matthiessen's Rule

The spectral Matthiessen's rule is commonly used to calculate the total phonon scattering rate when multiple scattering mechanisms exist. Here we predict the spectral phonon relaxation time $τ$ of defective bulk silicon using normal mode analysis based on molecular dynamics, and show that the spectral Matthiessen's rule is not accurate due to the neglect of the coupling between anharmonic phonon-phonon scattering $τ_a^{-1}$ and phonon-impurity scattering $τ_i^{-1}$. As a result, the spectral Matthiessen's rule underestimates the total phonon scattering rate, and hence overestimates the thermal conductivity $κ$ of mass-doped and Ge-doped silicon by about 20-40%. We have also directly estimated this coupling scattering rate, so called coupled five-phonon scattering $τ_{\rm couple}^{-1}$, and achieved good agreement between $τ_a^{-1}+τ_i^{-1}+τ_{\rm couple}^{-1}$ and the total scattering rate $τ_{tot}^{-1}$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.