Paper detail

Counting in Practical Anonymous Dynamic Networks is Polynomial

Anonymous Dynamic Networks is a harsh computational environment due to changing topology and lack of identifiers. Computing the size of the network, a problem known as Counting, is particularly challenging because messages received cannot be tagged to a specific sender. Previous works on Counting in Anonymous Dynamic Networks do not provide enough guarantees to be used in practice. Indeed, they either compute only an upper bound on the network size that may be as bad as exponential, or guarantee only double-exponential running time, or do not terminate, or guarantee only eventual termination without running-time guarantees. Faster experimental protocols do not guarantee the correct count. Recently, we presented the first Counting protocol that computes the exact count with exponential running-time guarantees. The protocol requires the presence of one leader node and knowledge of any upper bound Delta on the maximum number of neighbors that any node will ever have. In the present work, we complement the latter theoretical study evaluating the performance of such protocol in practice. We tested a variety of network topologies that may appear in practice, including extremal cases such as trees, paths, and continuously changing topologies. We also tested networks that temporarily are not connected. Our simulations showed that the protocol is polynomial for all the inputs tested, paving the way to use it in practical applications where topology changes are predictable. The simulations also provided insight on the impact of topology changes on information dissemination. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first experimental study that shows the possibility of computing the exact count in polynomial time in a variety of Anonymous Dynamic Networks that are worse than expected in practice.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.