Paper detail

Coulomb-nuclear dynamics in the weakly-bound 8Li breakup

A detailed study of total, Coulomb and nuclear breakup cross sections dependence on the projectile ground-state binding energy $\varepsilon_b$ is presented, by considering the $^8$Li+$^{12}$C and $^8$Li+$^{208}$Pb breakup reactions. To this end, apart from the experimental one-neutron separation energy of $^8$Li nucleus ($\varepsilon_b=2.03$~MeV), lower values of $\varepsilon_b$ down to $\varepsilon_b=0.01$~MeV, are also being considered. It is shown that all breakup processes become peripheral as $\varepsilon_b\to 0.01$ MeV, which is understood as due to the well-known large spacial extension of ground-state wave functions associated to weakly-bound projectiles. The Coulomb breakup cross section is found to be more strongly dependent on $\varepsilon_b$ than the nuclear breakup cross section, such that the Coulomb breakup becomes more significant as $\varepsilon_b$ decreases, even in a naturally nuclear-dominated reaction. This is mainly due to the long-range nature of the Coulomb forces, leading to a direct dependence of the Coulomb breakup on the electromagnetic transition matrix. It is also highlighted the fact that the nuclear absorption plays a minor role for small binding when the breakup becomes more peripheral.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.