Paper detail

Could trapped quintessence account for the laser-detuning-dependent acceleration of cold atoms in varying-frequency time-of-flight experiments?

Using a trapped quintessence model, a series of time-of-flight (TOF) experiments with a different frequency of probe light were designed and performed. The varying-frequency TOF (VFTOF) experiments demonstrated that the fall acceleration of test atoms is dependent on the detuning of the probe light frequency with respect to the atomic transition frequency. In appropriately designed experiments, if the scalar field in the model accounts for the accelerated expansion of the Universe entirely, the field will result in an observable fifth force. Meanwhile, the trapped quintessence model still satisfies all experimental bounds on deviations from general relativity due to both the saturation effect and the short interaction range of the scalar field. The scalar saturates at a value corresponding to the cosmological constant when the microscopic nonrelativistic matter density is large enough. The interaction range of the scalar is inversely proportional to the square root of the microscopic nonrelativistic matter density. The interaction range has been estimated to be several $μ\rm{m}$ in the current cosmic density. The Universe is assumed to be permeated with fuzzy dark matter, which means that the microscopic nonrelativistic matter density defined through the quantum wavefunctions of the ultralight particles can be used on the cosmic scale. By measuring the fall acceleration of the test atoms with the TOF method step-by-step in the detuning frequency domain of the probe light, we derived the dispersion curves of the measured acceleration versus the frequency detuning of the probe light. When the nonrelativistic matter density of the source increased due to the energy gained from the laser light, the test atoms were pulled to the center of the source, and vice versa.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.