Paper detail

Cost-effective BlackWater Raft on Highly Unreliable Nodes at Scale Out

The Raft algorithm maintains strong consistency across data replicas in Cloud. This algorithm divides nodes into leaders and followers, to satisfy read/write requests spanning geo-diverse sites. With the increase of workload, Raft shall provide scale-out performance in proportion. However, traditional scale-out techniques encounter bottlenecks in Raft, and when the provisioned sites exhaust local resources, the performance loss will grow exponentially. To provide scalability in Raft, this paper proposes a cost-effective mechanism for elastic auto-scaling in Raft, called BlackWater-Raft or BW-Raft. BW-Raft extends the original Raft with the following abstractions: (1) secretary nodes that take over expensive log synchronization operations from the leader, relaxing the performance constraints on locks. (2) massive low cost observer nodes that handle reads only, improving throughput for typical data intensive services. These abstractions are stateless, allowing elastic scale-out on unreliable yet cheap spot instances. In theory, we demonstrate that BW-Raft can maintain Raft's strong consistency guarantees when scaling out, processing a 50X increase in the number of nodes compared to the original Raft. We have prototyped the BW-Raft on key-value services and evaluated it with many state-of-the-arts on Amazon EC2 and Alibaba Cloud. Our results show that within the same budget, BW-Raft's resource footprint increments are 5-7X smaller than Multi-Raft, and 2X better than original Raft. Using spot instances, BW-Raft can reduces costs by 84.5\% compared to Multi-Raft. In the real world experiments, BW-Raft improves goodput of the 95th-percentile SLO by 9.4X, thus serving as an alternative for services scaling out with strong consistency.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.