Abstract

We revisit the joint constraints in the mixed hot dark matter scenario in which both thermally produced QCD axions and relic neutrinos are present. Upon recomputing the cosmological axion abundance via recent advances in the literature, we improve the state-of-the-art analyses and provide updated bounds on axion and neutrino masses. By avoiding approximate methods, such as the instantaneous decoupling approximation, and limitations due to the limited validity of the perturbative approach in QCD that forced to artificially divide the constraints from the axion-pion and the axion-gluon production channels, we find robust and self-consistent limits. We investigate the two most popular axion frameworks: KSVZ and DFSZ. From Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) light element abundances data we find for the KSVZ axion ΔNeff<0.31ΔN_{\rm eff}<0.31 and an axion mass bound ma<0.53m_a < 0.53 eV (i.e., a bound on the axion decay constant fa>1.07×107f_a > 1.07 \times 10^7 GeV) both at 95%95\% CL. These BBN bounds are improved to ΔNeff<0.14ΔN_{\rm eff}<0.14 and ma<0.16m_a< 0.16 eV (fa>3.56×107f_a > 3.56 \times 10^7 GeV) if a prior on the baryon energy density from Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data is assumed. When instead considering cosmological observations from the CMB temperature, polarization and lensing from the Planck satellite combined with large scale structure data we find ΔNeff<0.23ΔN_{\rm eff}<0.23, ma<0.28m_a< 0.28 eV (fa>2.02×107f_a > 2.02 \times 10^7 GeV) and ∑mν<0.16\sum m_ν< 0.16 eV at 95%95\% CL. This corresponds approximately to a factor of 55 improvement in the axion mass bound with respect to the existing limits. Very similar results are obtained for the DFSZ axion. We also forecast upcoming observations from future CMB and galaxy surveys, showing that they could reach percent level errors for ma∼1m_a\sim 1 eV.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.