Paper detail

Corrigendum and addendum to: How Populist are Parties? Measuring Degrees of Populism in Party Manifestos Using Supervised Machine Learning

This paper is a corrigendum and addendum to the previously published article: 'How Populist are Parties? Measuring Degrees of Populism in Party Manifestos Using Supervised Machine Learning' (Political Analysis, 1-17. doi:10.1017/pan.2021.29). These corrigendum and addendum were prepared to correct errors in data labelling and show some extra insights not included in the previously published paper. Here, we report these corrections and point to some additional conclusions by focusing on the effects of the label reshuffling per parties and years and presenting new figures wherever appropriate. We show that although the simplified labelling method proposed in the previously-published article can induce biases in the correlations with expert scores, random labelling reduces correlations significantly. We show that this is also true for correlations based on a manually-coded data set. These modifications are based on other evidence and results reported in detail in a future publication.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.