Paper detail

Correlation energy of the one-dimensional Coulomb gas

We introduce a new paradigm for finite and infinite strict-one-dimensional uniform electron gases. In this model, $n$ electrons are confined to a ring and interact via a bare Coulomb operator. In the high-density limit (small-$r_s$, where $r_s$ is the Seitz radius), we find that the reduced correlation energy is $\Ec(r_s,n) = \eps^{(2)}(n) + O(r_s)$, and we report explicit expressions for $\eps^{(2)}(n)$. In the thermodynamic (large-$n$) limit of this, we show that $\Ec(r_s) = - π^2/360 + O(r_s)$. In the low-density (large-$r_s$) limit, the system forms a Wigner crystal and we find that $\Ec(r_s) = -[\ln(\sqrt{2π})-3/4] r_s^{-1} + 0.359933 r_s^{-3/2} + O(r_s^{-2})$. Using these results, we propose a correlation functional that interpolates between the high- and low-density limits. The accuracy of the functional for intermediate densities is established by comparison with diffusion Monte Carlo results. Application to a non-uniform system is also reported.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.