Paper detail

Correction of systematic errors in scanning tunnelling spectra on semiconductor surfaces: the energy gap of Si(111)-7x7 at 0.3 K

The investigation of the electronic properties of semiconductor surfaces using scanning tunnelling spectroscopy (STS) is often hindered by non-equilibrium transport of the injected charge carriers. We propose a correction method for the resulting systematic errors in STS data, which is demonstrated for the well known Si(111)-(7x7) surface. The surface has an odd number of electrons per surface unit cell and is metallic above 20 K. We observe an energy gap in the ground state of this surface by STS at 0.3 K. After correction, the measured width of the gap is (70 +- 15) meV which is compatible with previous less precise estimates. No sharp peak of the density of states at the Fermi level is observed, in contrast to proposed models for the Si(111)-(7x7) surface.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.