Paper detail

Copula-Stein Discrepancy: A Generator-Based Stein Operator for Archimedean Dependence

Kernel Stein discrepancies (KSDs) are widely used for goodness-of-fit testing, but standard KSDs can be insensitive to higher-order dependence features such as tail dependence. We introduce the Copula-Stein Discrepancy (CSD), which defines a Stein operator directly on the copula density to target dependence geometry rather than the joint score. For Archimedean copulas, CSD admits a closed-form Stein kernel derived from the scalar generator. We prove that CSD metrizes weak convergence of copula distributions, admits an empirical estimator with minimax-optimal rate $O_P(n^{-1/2})$, and is sensitive to differences in tail dependence coefficients. We further extend the framework beyond Archimedean families to general copulas, including elliptical and vine constructions. Computationally, exact CSD kernel evaluation is linear in dimension, and a random-feature approximation reduces the quadratic $O(n^2)$ sample scaling to near-linear $\tilde{O}(n)$; experiments show near-nominal Type~I error, increasing power, and rapid concentration of the approximation toward the exact $\widehat{\mathrm{CSD}}_n^2$ as the number of features grows.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.