Paper detail

Cooling, conductance and thermometric performance of non-ideal normal metal-superconductor tunnel junction pairs

We have investigated the effect of a difference in the tunnelling resistances of the individual normal metal-insulator-superconductor (NIS) tunnel junctions in a double junction SINIS device, with particular emphasis on the impact on the conductance, cooling and thermometric performance. By solving the electrical and thermal equations of the junctions in a self-consistent way, we find that asymmetry gives rise to many new features, such as appearance of an excess sub-gap current, improved cooling performance, exhibition of negative differential resistance, and improved temperature range of thermometric sensitivity. Experiments were also carried out to complement some of the numerical results. In addition, we studied theoretically and experimentally the effect of a finite series resistance, which also causes an excess current in the subgap region, and a suppression of the conductance maxima at the gap edge. Experimental results agree well with the theoretical predictions.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.