Paper detail

Convex Hulls of Multiple Random Walks: A Large-Deviation Study

We study the polygons governing the convex hull of a point set created by the steps of $n$ independent two-dimensional random walkers. Each such walk consists of $T$ discrete time steps, where $x$ and $y$ increments are i.i.d. Gaussian. We analyze area $A$ and perimeter $L$ of the convex hulls. We obtain probability densities for these two quantities over a large range of the support by using a large-deviation approach allowing us to study densities below $10^{-900}$. We find that the densities exhibit a universal scaling behavior as a function of $A/T$ and $L/\sqrt{T}$, respectively. As in the case of one walker ($n=1$), the densities follow Gaussian distributions for $L$ and $\sqrt{A}$, respectively. We also obtained the rate functions for the area and perimeter, rescaled with the scaling behavior of their maximum possible values, and found limiting functions for $T \rightarrow \infty$, revealing that the densities follow the large-deviation principle. These rate functions can be described by a power law for $n \rightarrow \infty$ as found in the $n=1$ case. We also investigated the behavior of the averages as a function of the number of walks $n$ and found good agreement with the predicted behavior.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.