Paper detail

Convergence of Smoothed Empirical Measures with Applications to Entropy Estimation

This paper studies convergence of empirical measures smoothed by a Gaussian kernel. Specifically, consider approximating $P\ast\mathcal{N}_σ$, for $\mathcal{N}_σ\triangleq\mathcal{N}(0,σ^2 \mathrm{I}_d)$, by $\hat{P}_n\ast\mathcal{N}_σ$, where $\hat{P}_n$ is the empirical measure, under different statistical distances. The convergence is examined in terms of the Wasserstein distance, total variation (TV), Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence, and $χ^2$-divergence. We show that the approximation error under the TV distance and 1-Wasserstein distance ($\mathsf{W}_1$) converges at rate $e^{O(d)}n^{-\frac{1}{2}}$ in remarkable contrast to a typical $n^{-\frac{1}{d}}$ rate for unsmoothed $\mathsf{W}_1$ (and $d\ge 3$). For the KL divergence, squared 2-Wasserstein distance ($\mathsf{W}_2^2$), and $χ^2$-divergence, the convergence rate is $e^{O(d)}n^{-1}$, but only if $P$ achieves finite input-output $χ^2$ mutual information across the additive white Gaussian noise channel. If the latter condition is not met, the rate changes to $ω(n^{-1})$ for the KL divergence and $\mathsf{W}_2^2$, while the $χ^2$-divergence becomes infinite - a curious dichotomy. As a main application we consider estimating the differential entropy $h(P\ast\mathcal{N}_σ)$ in the high-dimensional regime. The distribution $P$ is unknown but $n$ i.i.d samples from it are available. We first show that any good estimator of $h(P\ast\mathcal{N}_σ)$ must have sample complexity that is exponential in $d$. Using the empirical approximation results we then show that the absolute-error risk of the plug-in estimator converges at the parametric rate $e^{O(d)}n^{-\frac{1}{2}}$, thus establishing the minimax rate-optimality of the plug-in. Numerical results that demonstrate a significant empirical superiority of the plug-in approach to general-purpose differential entropy estimators are provided.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.