Paper detail

Convergence of Even Simpler Robots without Location Information

The design of distributed gathering and convergence algorithms for tiny robots has recently received much attention. In particular, it has been shown that convergence problems can even be solved for very weak, \emph{oblivious} robots: robots which cannot maintain state from one round to the next. The oblivious robot model is hence attractive from a self-stabilization perspective, where state is subject to adversarial manipulation. However, to the best of our knowledge, all existing robot convergence protocols rely on the assumption that robots, despite being "weak", can measure distances. We in this paper initiate the study of convergence protocols for even simpler robots, called \emph{monoculus robots}: robots which cannot measure distances. In particular, we introduce two natural models which relax the assumptions on the robots' cognitive capabilities: (1) a Locality Detection ($\mathcal{LD}$) model in which a robot can only detect whether another robot is closer than a given constant distance or not, (2) an Orthogonal Line Agreement ($\mathcal{OLA}$) model in which robots only agree on a pair of orthogonal lines (say North-South and West-East, but without knowing which is which). The problem turns out to be non-trivial, and simple median and angle bisection strategies can easily increase the distances among robots (e.g., the area of the enclosing convex hull) over time. Our main contribution are deterministic self-stabilizing convergence algorithms for these two models, together with a complexity analysis. We also show that in some sense, the assumptions made in our models are minimal: by relaxing the assumptions on the \textit{monoculus robots} further, we run into impossibility results.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.