Paper detail

Convergence Analysis of the Data Augmentation Algorithm for Bayesian Linear Regression with Non-Gaussian Errors

Gaussian errors are sometimes inappropriate in a multivariate linear regression setting because, for example, the data contain outliers. In such situations, it is often assumed that the error density is a scale mixture of multivariate normal densities that takes the form $f(\varepsilon) = \int_0^\infty |Σ|^{-\frac{1}{2}} u^{\frac{d}{2}} \, ϕ_d \big( Σ^{-\frac{1}{2}} \sqrt{u} \, \varepsilon \big) \, h(u) \, du$, where $d$ is the dimension of the response, $ϕ_d(\cdot)$ is the standard $d$-variate normal density, $Σ$ is an unknown $d \times d$ positive definite scale matrix, and $h(\cdot)$ is some fixed mixing density. Combining this alternative regression model with a default prior on the unknown parameters results in a highly intractable posterior density. Fortunately, there is a simple data augmentation (DA) algorithm and a corresponding Haar PX-DA algorithm that can be used to explore this posterior. This paper provides conditions (on $h$) for geometric ergodicity of the Markov chains underlying these Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms. These results are extremely important from a practical standpoint because geometric ergodicity guarantees the existence of the central limit theorems that form the basis of all the standard methods of calculating valid asymptotic standard errors for MCMC-based estimators. The main result is that, if $h$ converges to 0 at the origin at an appropriate rate, and $\int_0^\infty u^{\frac{d}{2}} \, h(u) \, du < \infty$, then the DA and Haar PX-DA Markov chains are both geometrically ergodic. This result is quite far-reaching. For example, it implies the geometric ergodicity of the DA and Haar PX-DA Markov chains whenever $h$ is generalized inverse Gaussian, log-normal, inverted gamma (with shape parameter larger than $d/2$), or Fréchet (with shape parameter larger than $d/2$).

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.