Paper detail

Convergence Analysis for Regular Wireless Consensus Networks

Average consensus algorithms can be implemented over wireless sensor networks (WSN), where global statistics can be computed using communications among sensor nodes locally. Simple execution, robustness to global topology changes due to frequent node failures and underlying distributed philosophy has made consensus algorithms more suitable to WSNs. Since these algorithms are iterative in nature, their performance is characterized by convergence speed. We study the convergence of the average consensus algorithms for WSNs using regular graphs. We obtained the analytical expressions for optimal consensus and convergence parameters which decides the convergence time for r-nearest neighbor cycle and torus networks. We have also derived the generalized expression for optimal consensus and convergence parameters for m-dimensional r-nearest neighbor torus networks. The obtained analytical results agree with the simulation results and shown the effect of network dimension, number of nodes and transmission radius on convergence time. This work provides the basic analytical tools for managing and controlling the performance of average consensus algorithm in the finite sized practical networks.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.