Paper detail

Controlling the False Discovery Rate for Binary Feature Selection via Knockoff

Variable selection has been widely used in data analysis for the past decades, and it becomes increasingly important in the Big Data era as there are usually hundreds of variables available in a dataset. To enhance interpretability of a model, identifying potentially relevant features is often a step before fitting all the features into a regression model. A good variable selection method should effectively control the fraction of false discoveries and ensure large enough power of its selection set. In a lot of contemporary data applications, a great portion of features are coded as binary variables. Binary features are widespread in many fields, from online controlled experiments to genome science to physical statistics. Although there has recently been a handful of literature for provable false discovery rate (FDR) control in variable selection, most of the theoretical analyses were based on some strong dependency assumption or Gaussian assumption among features. In this paper we propose a variable selection method in regression framework for selecting binary features. Under mild conditions, we show that FDR is controlled exactly under a target level in a finite sample if the underlying distribution of the binary features is known. We show in simulations that FDR control is still attained when feature distribution is estimated from data. We also provide theoretical results on the power of our variables selection method in a linear regression model or a logistic regression model. In the restricted settings where competitors exist, we show in simulations and real data application on a HIV antiretroviral therapy dataset that our method has higher power than the competitor.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.