Abstract

Contrastive dimension reduction methods have been developed for case-control study data to identify variation that is enriched in the foreground (case) data X relative to the background (control) data Y. Here, we develop contrastive regression for the setting when there is a response variable r associated with each foreground observation. This situation occurs frequently when, for example, the unaffected controls do not have a disease grade or intervention dosage but the affected cases have a disease grade or intervention dosage, as in autism severity, solid tumors stages, polyp sizes, or warfarin dosages. Our contrastive regression model captures shared low-dimensional variation between the predictors in the cases and control groups, and then explains the case-specific response variables through the variance that remains in the predictors after shared variation is removed. We show that, in one single-nucleus RNA sequencing dataset on autism severity in postmortem brain samples from donors with and without autism and in another single-cell RNA sequencing dataset on cellular differentiation in chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyps, our contrastive linear regression performs feature ranking and identifies biologically-informative predictors associated with response that cannot be identified using other approaches

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.