Paper detail

Contrast-to-noise ratio analysis of microscopic diffusion anisotropy indices in q-space trajectory imaging

Diffusion anisotropy in diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is commonly quantified with normalized diffusion anisotropy indices (DAIs). Most often, the fractional anisotropy (FA) is used, but several alternative DAIs have been introduced in attempts to maximize the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in diffusion anisotropy maps. Examples include the scaled relative anisotropy (sRA), the gamma variate anisotropy index (GV), the surface anisotropy (UAsurf), and the lattice index (LI). With the advent of multidimensional diffusion encoding it became possible to determine the presence of microscopic diffusion anisotropy in a voxel, which is theoretically independent of orientation coherence. In accordance with DTI, the microscopic anisotropy is typically quantified by the microscopic fractional anisotropy (uFA). In this work, in addition to the uFA, the four microscopic diffusion anisotropy indices (uDAIs) usRA, uGV, uUAsurf, and uLI are defined in analogy to the respective DAIs by means of the average diffusion tensor and the covariance tensor. Simulations with three representative distributions of microscopic diffusion tensors revealed distinct CNR differences when differentiating between isotropic and microscopically anisotropic diffusion. q-Space trajectory imaging (QTI) was employed to acquire brain in-vivo maps of all indices. For this purpose, a 15 min protocol featuring linear, planar, and spherical tensor encoding was used. The resulting maps were of good quality and exhibited different contrasts, e.g. between gray and white matter. This indicates that it may be beneficial to use more than one uDAI in future investigational studies.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.