Paper detail

Continuous time random walk concepts applied to extended mode coupling theory: A study of the Stokes-Einstein breakdown

In an attempt to extend the mode coupling theory (MCT) to lower temperatures, an Unified theory was proposed which within the MCT framework incorporated the activated dynamics via the random first order transition theory (RFOT). Here we show that the theory although successful in describing other properties of supercooled liquids is unable to capture the Stokes-Einstein breakdown. We then show using continuous time random work (CTRW) formalism that the Unified theory is equivalent to a CTRW dynamics in presence of two waiting time distributions. It is known from earlier work on CTRW that in such cases the total dynamics is dominated by the fast motion. This explains the failure of the Unified theory in predicting the SE breakdown as both the structural relaxation and the diffusion process are described by the comparatively fast MCT like dynamics. The study also predicts that other forms of extended MCT will face a similar issue. We next modify the Unified theory by applying the concept of renewal theory, usually used in CTRW models where the distribution has a long tail. According to this theory the first jump given by the persistent time is slower than the subsequent jumps given by the exchange time. We first show that for systems with two waiting time distributions even when both the distributions are exponential the persistent time is larger than the exchange time. We also identify the persistent time with the slower activated process. The extended Unified theory can now explain the SE breakdown. In this extended theory at low temperatures the structural relaxation is described by the activated dynamics whereas the diffusion is primarily determined by the MCT like dynamics leading to a decoupling between them. We also calculate a dynamic lengthscale from the wavenumber dependence of the relaxation time. We find that this dynamic length scale grows faster than the static length scale.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.