Paper detail

Continuous inverse regression

We provide new theoretical results in the field of inverse regression methods for dimension reduction. Our approach is based on the study of some empirical processes that lie close to a certain dimension reduction subspace, called the central subspace. The study of these processes essentially includes weak convergence results and the consistency of some general bootstrap procedures. While such properties are used to obtain new results about sliced inverse regression, they mainly allow to define a natural family of methods for dimension reduction. First the estimation methods are shown to have root $n$ rates and the bootstrap is proved to be valid. Second, we describe a family of Cramér-von Mises test statistics that can be used in testing structural properties of the central subspace or the significancy of some sets of predictors. We show that the quantiles of those tests could be computed by bootstrap. Most of the existing methods related to inverse regression involve a slicing of the response that is difficult to select in practice. While our approach guarantee a comprehensive estimation, the slicing is no longer needed.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.