Paper detail

Continuity equation for probability as a requirement of inference over paths

In this work we present the fundamental ideas of inference over paths, and show how this formalism implies the continuity equation, which is central for the derivation of the main partial differential equations that constitute non-equilibrium statistical mechanics. Equations such as the Liouville equation, Fokker-Planck equation, among others can be recovered as particular cases of the continuity equation, under different probability fluxes. We derive the continuity equation in its most general form through what we call the \bf time-slicing equation, which lays down the procedure to go from the representation in terms of a path probability functional $ρ[X()]$ to a time-dependent probability density $ρ(x; t)$. The original probability functional $ρ[X()]$ can in principle be constructed from different methods of inference; in this work we sketch an application using the maximum path entropy or maximum caliber principle.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.