Paper detail

Context-Aware Discrimination Detection in Job Vacancies using Computational Language Models

Discriminatory job vacancies are disapproved worldwide, but remain persistent. Discrimination in job vacancies can be explicit by directly referring to demographic memberships of candidates. More implicit forms of discrimination are also present that may not always be illegal but still influence the diversity of applicants. Explicit written discrimination is still present in numerous job vacancies, as was recently observed in the Netherlands. Current efforts for the detection of explicit discrimination concern the identification of job vacancies containing potentially discriminating terms such as "young" or "male". However, automatic detection is inefficient due to low precision: e.g. "we are a young company" or "working with mostly male patients" are phrases that contain explicit terms, while the context shows that these do not reflect discriminatory content. In this paper, we show how machine learning based computational language models can raise precision in the detection of explicit discrimination by identifying when the potentially discriminating terms are used in a discriminatory context. We focus on gender discrimination, which indeed suffers from low precision when filtering explicit terms. First, we created a data set for gender discrimination in job vacancies. Second, we investigated a variety of computational language models for discriminatory context detection. Third, we evaluated the capability of these models to detect unforeseen discriminating terms in context. The results show that machine learning based methods can detect explicit gender discrimination with high precision and help in finding new forms of discrimination. Accordingly, the proposed methods can substantially increase the effectiveness of detecting job vacancies which are highly suspected to be discriminatory. In turn, this may lower the discrimination experienced at the start of the recruitment process.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.