Paper detail

Contention resolution on a restrained channel

We examine deterministic broadcasting on multiple-access channels for a scenario when packets are injected continuously by an adversary to the buffers of the devices at rate $ρ$ packages per round. The aim is to maintain system stability, that is, bounded queues. In contrast to previous work we assume that there is a strict limit of available power, defined as the total number of stations allowed to transmit or listen to the channel at a given time, that can never be exceeded. We study how this constraint influences the quality of services with particular focus on stability. We show that in the regime of deterministic algorithms, the significance of energy restriction depends strongly on communication capabilities of broadcasting protocols. For the adaptive and full-sensing protocols, wherein stations may substantially adopt their behavior to the injection pattern, one can construct efficient algorithms using very small amounts of power without sacrificing throughput or stability of the system. In particular, we construct constant-energy adaptive and full sensing protocols stable for $ρ=1$ and any $ρ<1$, respectively, even for worst case (adversarial) injection patterns. Surprisingly, for the case of acknowledgment based algorithms that cannot adopt to the situation on the channel (i.e., their transmitting pattern is fixed in advance), limiting power leads to reducing the throughput. That is, for this class of protocols in order to preserve stability we need to reduce injection rate significantly. We support our theoretical analysis by simulation results of algorithms constructed in the paper. We depict how they work for systems of moderate, realistic sizes. We also provide a comprehensive simulation to compare our algorithms with backoff algorithms, which are common in real-world implementations, in terms of queue sizes and energy consumption.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.