Paper detail

Containing rumors spreading on correlated multiplex networks

Rumors flooding on rapidly-growing online social networks has geared much attention from many fronts. Individuals can transmit rumors via numerous channels since they can be active on multiple platforms. However, no systematic theoretical research of rumors containing dynamics on multiplex networks has been conducted yet. In this study, we propose a family of containing strategies based on the degree product $\mathcal{K}$ of each user on the multiplex networks. Then, we develop a heterogeneous edge-based compartmental theory to comprehend the containing dynamics. The simulation results demonstrate that strategies with preference to block users with large $\mathcal{K}$ can significantly reduce the rumor outbreak size and enlarge the threshold. Besides, better performance can be expected on heterogeneous multiplex networks with the increasing of preference intensity and degree heterogeneity. Moreover, take the inter-layer degree correlations $r_s$ into consideration, the strategy performs best on multiplex networks with $r_s=-1$, $r_s=1$ the second, and $r_s=0$ the last. On the contrary, if we prefer to block users with small $\mathcal{K}$ rather than large $\mathcal{K}$, the containing performance will be worse than that of blocking users randomly on most multiplex networks except for uncorrelated multiplex networks with uniform degree distribution. We found that the blocking preferences have no influence on the containing results on uncorrelated multiplex networks with uniform degree distribution. Our theoretical analysis can well predict the rumors containing results and performance differences in all the cases studied. The systematic theoretical research of rumors containing dynamics on multiplex networks in this study will offer inspirations for further investigations on this issue.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.