Paper detail

Contact graphs of unit sphere packings revisited

The contact graph of an arbitrary finite packing of unit balls in Euclidean 3-space is the (simple) graph whose vertices correspond to the packing elements and whose two vertices are connected by an edge if the corresponding two packing elements touch each other. One of the most basic questions on contact graphs is to find the maximum number of edges that a contact graph of a packing of n unit balls can have. In this paper, improving earlier estimates, we prove that the number of touching pairs in an arbitrary packing of n unit balls in Euclidean 3-space is always less than $6n-0.926n^{2/3}$. Moreover, as a natural extension of the above problem, we propose to study the maximum number of touching triplets (resp., quadruples) in an arbitrary packing of n unit balls in Euclidean 3-space. In particular, we prove that the number of touching triplets (resp., quadruples) in an arbitrary packing of n unit balls in Euclidean 3-space is at most $25/3n$ (resp., $11/4n$).

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.