Paper detail

Constraints on the CKM angle $α$ from the measured CP asymmetries and branching ratios of $B \to π^+ π^-, π^+ π^0$ and $K^0π^+$ decays

In this paper, we draw constraints on the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) angle $α$ and the strong phase $δ$ from the experimental measurements of $\ssb$, the CP-violating asymmetries and branching ratios of $B \to π^+ π^-, π^+ π^0$ and $K^0 π^+$ decays. In the SM, the measured $\ssb$ leads to an upper limit on $α$: $α\leq 180^\circ-β$. Taking the weighted-average of the newest BaBar and Belle measurements of $\spp$ and $\app$ in $B^0 \to π^+π^-$ decay as the experimental input, we find the allowed range of angle $α$, $76^\circ \leq α\leq 135^\circ$ for $r=|P/T| =0.3 \pm 0.1 $. From the measured CP-averaged branching ratios of $B \to π^+ π^-, π^+ π^0$ and $K^0 π^+$ decays, we found an inequality, $\cosα \cosδ \geq 0.45$. The region of $70^\circ \leq α\leq 110^\circ$ is thus excluded by applying this inequality. The combined constraints on $α$ and $δ$ are $117^\circ \leq α\leq 135^\circ$ and $-160^\circ \leq δ\leq -132^\circ$ if we take $\spp=0.49 \pm 0.27$ and $\app=0.51 \pm 0.19$ as the experimental input. The new lower limit on the angle $α$ is dominated by the measured branching ratios considered in this paper, and is much stronger than those obtained before.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.