Paper detail

Constraints on the Brans-Dicke gravity theory with the Planck data

Based on the new cosmic CMB temperature data from the Planck satellite, the 9 year polarization data from the WMAP, the BAO distance ratio data from the SDSS and 6dF surveys, we place a new constraint on the Brans-Dicke theory. We adopt a parametrization $ζ=\ln(1+1/ω})$, where the general relativity (GR) limit corresponds to $ζ= 0$. We find no evidence of deviation from general relativity. At 95% probability, $-0.00246 < ζ< 0.00567$, correspondingly, the region $-407.0 < ω<175.87$ is excluded. If we restrict ourselves to the $ζ>0$ (i.e. $ω>0$) case, then the 95% probability interval is $ζ<0.00549$, corresponding to $ω> 181.65$. We can also translate this result to a constraint on the variation of gravitational constant, and find the variation rate today as $\dot{G}=-1.42^{+2.48}_{-2.27} \times 10^{-13} $yr$^{-1} $ ($1σ$ error bar), the integrated change since the epoch of recombination is $δG/G = 0.0104^{+0.0186}_{-0.0067} $ ($1σ$ error bar). These limits on the variation of gravitational constant are comparable with the precision of solar system experiments.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.