Paper detail

Constraints Imposed by Symmetry on Pairing Operators for the Pnictides

Considering model Hamiltonians that respect the symmetry properties of the pnictides, it is argued that pairing interactions that couple electrons at different orbitals with an orbital-dependent pairing strength inevitably lead to interband pairing matrix elements, at least in some regions of the Brillouin zone. Such interband pairing has not been considered of relevance in multiorbital systems in previous investigations. It is also observed that if, instead, a purely intraband pairing interaction is postulated, this requires that the pairing operator has the form $Δ^+(k)=f(k) \sum_α d^+_{k,α,\uparrow}d^+_{-k, α,\downarrow}$ where $α$ labels the orbitals considered in the model and f(k) arises from the spatial location of the coupled electrons or holes. This means that the gaps at two different Fermi surfaces involving momenta $k_F$ and $k'_F$ can only differ by the ratio $f(k_F)/ f(k'_F)$ and that electrons in different orbitals must be subject to the same pairing attraction, thus requiring fine tuning. These results suggest that previously neglected interband pairing tendencies could actually be of relevance in a microscopic description of the pairing mechanism in the pnictides.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.