Paper detail

Constraints from $Λ$ hypernuclei on the $ΛNN$ content of the $Λ$-nucleus potential

A depth of $D_Λ\approx -28$ MeV for the $Λ$-nucleus potential was confirmed in 1988 by studying $Λ$ binding energies deduced from $(π^+,K^+)$ spectra measured across the periodic table. Modern two-body hyperon-nucleon interaction models require additional interaction terms, most likely $ΛNN$ three-body terms, to reproduce $D_Λ$. In this work we apply a suitably constructed $Λ$-nucleus density dependent optical potential to binding energy calculations of observed $1s_Λ$ and $1p_Λ$ states in the mass range $12\leq A\leq 208$. The resulting $ΛNN$ contribution to $D_Λ$, about 14 MeV repulsion at symmetric nuclear matter density $ρ_0=0.17$ fm$^{-3}$, makes $D_Λ$ increasingly repulsive at $ρ\gtrsim 3ρ_0$, leading possibly to little or no $Λ$ hyperon content of neutron-star matter. This suggests in some models a stiff equation of state that may support two solar-mass neutron stars.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.