BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Paper detail

Constraining the S factor of 15N(p,g)16O at Astrophysical Energies

The 15N(p,g)16O reaction represents a break out reaction linking the first and second cycle of the CNO cycles redistributing the carbon and nitrogen abundances into the oxygen range. The reaction is dominated by two broad resonances at Ep = 338 keV and 1028 keV and a Direct Capture contribution to the ground state of 16O. Interference effects between these contributions in both the low energy region (Ep < 338 keV) and in between the two resonances (338 <Ep < 1028 keV) can dramatically effect the extrapolation to energies of astrophysical interest. To facilitate a reliable extrapolation the 15N(p,g)16O reaction has been remeasured covering the energy range from Ep=1800 keV down to 130 keV. The results have been analyzed in the framework of a multi-level R-matrix theory and a S(0) value of 39.6 keV b has been found.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
P. J. LeBlancG. ImbrianiJ. GoerresM. JunkerR. AzumaM. BeardD. BemmererA. BestC. BrogginiA. CaciolliP. CorvisieroH. CostantiniM. CouderR. deBoerZ. ElekesS. FalahatA. FormicolaZs. FulopG. GervinoA. GuglielmettiC. GustavinoGy. GyurkyF. KaeppelerA. KontosR. KuntzH. LeisteA. LemutQ. LiB. LimataM. MartaC. MazzocchiR. MenegazzoS. O&#39;BrienA. PalumboP. PratiV. RocaC. RolfsC. Rossi AlvarezE. SomorjaiE. StechO. StranieroF. StriederW. TanF. TerrasiH. P. TrautvetterE. UbersederM. Wiescher
nucl-ex
Open graphReviewsDiscussion

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access47 authors1 topic
Imported metadata coverageMissing code, dataset, citation and institution fields are tracked without dominating the paper.Details
Citations: 0Reviews: 0Saves: 0Code: not linkedDataset: not linkedInstitutions: 0

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Like0Dislike0Score 0

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Save to reading list0
Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

P. J. LeBlancG. ImbrianiJ. GoerresM. JunkerR. AzumaM. BeardD. BemmererA. BestC. BrogginiA. CaciolliP. CorvisieroH. CostantiniM. CouderR. deBoerZ. ElekesS. FalahatA. FormicolaZs. FulopG. GervinoA. GuglielmettiC. GustavinoGy. GyurkyF. KaeppelerA. KontosR. KuntzH. LeisteA. LemutQ. LiB. LimataM. MartaC. MazzocchiR. MenegazzoS. O&#39;BrienA. PalumboP. PratiV. RocaC. RolfsC. Rossi AlvarezE. SomorjaiE. StechO. StranieroF. StriederW. TanF. TerrasiH. P. TrautvetterE. UbersederM. Wiescher

Institutions

No institution affiliation has been imported for this paper yet.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form
Log in to review

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form
Log in to comment

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.