Paper detail

Constraining the $^{22}$Ne($α$,$γ$)$^{26}$Mg and $^{22}$Ne($α$,n)$^{25}$Mg reaction rates using sub-Coulomb $α$-transfer reactions

The $^{22}$Ne($α$,$γ$)$^{26}$Mg and $^{22}$Ne($α$,n)$^{25}$Mg reactions play an important role in astrophysics because they have significant influence on the neutron flux during the weak branch of the s-process. We constrain the astrophysical rates for these reactions by measuring partial $α$-widths of resonances in $^{26}$Mg located in the Gamow window for the $^{22}$Ne+$α$ capture. These resonances were populated using $^{22}$Ne($^6$Li,d)$^{26}$Mg and $^{22}$Ne($^7$Li,t)$^{26}$Mg reactions at energies near the Coulomb barrier. At these low energies $α$-transfer reactions favor population of low spin states and the extracted partial $α$-widths for the observed resonances exhibit only minor dependence on the model parameters. The astrophysical rates for both the $^{22}$Ne($α$,$γ$)$^{26}$Mg and the $^{22}$Ne($α$,n)$^{25}$Mg reactions are shown to be significantly different than the previously suggested values.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access12 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.