Paper detail

Constraining Penguin Contributions and the CKM Angle $γ$ through $B_d\toπ^+π^-$

The decays $B_d\toπ^+π^-$ and $B_s\to K^+K^-$ provide an interesting strategy to extract the CKM angle $γ$ at ``second-generation'' $B$-physics experiments of the LHC era. A variant for ``first-generation'' experiments can be obtained, if $B_s\to K^+K^-$ is replaced by $B_d\toπ^\mp K^\pm$. We show that the most recent experimental results for the CP-averaged $B_d\toπ^+π^-$ and $B_d\toπ^\mp K^\pm$ branching ratios imply a rather restricted range for the corresponding penguin parameters, and upper bounds on the direct CP asymmetries $A_{CP}^{dir}(B_d\toπ^+π^-)$ and $A_{CP}^{dir}(B_d\toπ^\mp K^\pm)$. Moreover, we point out that interesting constraints on $γ$ can be obtained from the CP-averaged $B_d\toπ^+π^-$ and $B_d\toπ^\mp K^\pm$ branching ratios, if in addition mixing-induced CP violation in the former decay is measured, and the $B^0_d$--$\bar{B^0_d}$ mixing phase is fixed through $B_d\to J/ψK_S$. An extraction of $γ$ becomes possible, if furthermore direct CP violation in $B_d\toπ^+π^-$ or $B_d\toπ^\mp K^\pm$ is observed.

preprint2000arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.