Paper detail

Constraining Bianchi Type I Universe With Type Ia Supernova and H(z) Data

We use recent 36 observational Hubble data (OHD) in the redshift range $0.07\leq z\leq 2.36$, latest \textgravedbl joint light curves\textacutedbl (JLA) sample, comprised of 740 type Ia supernovae (SNIa) in the redshift range $0.01\leq z \leq 1.30$, and their joint combination datasets to constrain anisotropic Bianchi type I (BI) dark energy (DE) model. To estimate model parameters, we apply Hamiltonian Monte Carlo technique. We also compute the covariance matrix for BI dark energy model by considering different datasets to compare the correlation between model parameters. To check the acceptability of our fittings, all results are compared with those obtained from 9 year WMAP as well as Planck (2015) collaboration. Our estimations show that at 68\% confidence level the dark energy equation of state (EOS) parameter for OHD or JLA datasets alone varies between quintessence and phantom regions whereas for OHD+JLA dataset this parameter only varies in phantom region. It is also found that the current cosmic anisotropy is of order $\sim10^{-3}$ which imply that the OHD and JLA datasets do not put tight constraint on this parameter. Therefore, to constraint anisotropy parameter, it is necessary to use high redshif dataset namely cosmic microwave background (CMB). Moreover, from the calculation of $p$-value associated with $χ^{2}$ statistic we observed that non of the $ω\mbox{BI}$ and flat $ω\mbox{CDM}$ models rule out by OHD or JLA datasets. The deceleration parameter is obtained as $q=-0.46^{+0.89 +0.36}_{-0.41 -0.37}$, $q=-0.619^{+0.12 +0.20}_{-0.095 -0.24}$, and $q=-0.52^{+0.080 +0.014}_{-0.046 -0.15}$ for OHD, SNIa, and OHD+SNIa data respectively.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.