Paper detail

Constrained regret minimization for multi-criterion multi-armed bandits

We consider a stochastic multi-armed bandit setting and study the problem of constrained regret minimization over a given time horizon. Each arm is associated with an unknown, possibly multi-dimensional distribution, and the merit of an arm is determined by several, possibly conflicting attributes. The aim is to optimize a 'primary' attribute subject to user-provided constraints on other 'secondary' attributes. We assume that the attributes can be estimated using samples from the arms' distributions, and that the estimators enjoy suitable concentration properties. We propose an algorithm called Con-LCB that guarantees a logarithmic regret, i.e., the average number of plays of all non-optimal arms is at most logarithmic in the horizon. The algorithm also outputs a Boolean flag that correctly identifies, with high probability, whether the given instance is feasible/infeasible with respect to the constraints. We also show that Con-LCB is optimal within a universal constant, i.e., that more sophisticated algorithms cannot do much better universally. Finally, we establish a fundamental trade-off between regret minimization and feasibility identification. Our framework finds natural applications, for instance, in financial portfolio optimization, where risk constrained maximization of expected return is meaningful.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.