Paper detail

Constrained Multi-shape Evolution for Overlapping Cytoplasm Segmentation

Segmenting overlapping cytoplasm of cells in cervical smear images is a clinically essential task, for quantitatively measuring cell-level features in order to diagnose cervical cancer. This task, however, remains rather challenging, mainly due to the deficiency of intensity (or color) information in the overlapping region. Although shape prior-based models that compensate intensity deficiency by introducing prior shape information (shape priors) about cytoplasm are firmly established, they often yield visually implausible results, mainly because they model shape priors only by limited shape hypotheses about cytoplasm, exploit cytoplasm-level shape priors alone, and impose no shape constraint on the resulting shape of the cytoplasm. In this paper, we present a novel and effective shape prior-based approach, called constrained multi-shape evolution, that segments all overlapping cytoplasms in the clump simultaneously by jointly evolving each cytoplasm's shape guided by the modeled shape priors. We model local shape priors (cytoplasm--level) by an infinitely large shape hypothesis set which contains all possible shapes of the cytoplasm. In the shape evolution, we compensate intensity deficiency for the segmentation by introducing not only the modeled local shape priors but also global shape priors (clump--level) modeled by considering mutual shape constraints of cytoplasms in the clump. We also constrain the resulting shape in each evolution to be in the built shape hypothesis set, for further reducing implausible segmentation results. We evaluated the proposed method in two typical cervical smear datasets, and the extensive experimental results show that the proposed method is effective to segment overlapping cytoplasm, consistently outperforming the state-of-the-art methods.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.