Paper detail

Consistent Relative Confidence and Label-Free Model Selection for Convolutional Neural Networks

In this paper, we are concerned with image classification with deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs). We focus on the following question: given a set of candidate CNN models, how to select the right one with the best generalization property for the current task? Current model selection methods all require access to a batch of labeled data for computing a pre-specified performance metric, such as the cross-entropy loss, the classification error rate and the negative log-likelihood. In many practical cases, labels are not available in time as labeling itself is a time-consuming and expensive task. To this end, we propose an approach to CNN model selection using only unlabeled data. We develop this method based on a principle termed consistent relative confidence. Experimental results on benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our method.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.