Paper detail

Consistent mass formulas for the four-dimensional dyonic NUT-charged spacetimes

In our previous work, a novel idea that the NUT charge can be thought of as a thermodynamical multi-hair has been advocated to describe perfectly the thermodynamical character of the generic four-dimensional Taub-NUT spacetimes. According to this scheme, the Komar mass M, the gravito-magnetic charge and/or the dual (magnetic) mass N, together with a new secondary hair J_N=MN, namely, a Kerr-like conserved angular momentum, enter into the standard forms of the first law and Bekenstein-Smarr mass formula. Distinguished from other recent attempts, our consistent thermodynamic differential and integral mass formulae are both obtainable from a meaningful Christodoulou-Ruffini-type squared mass formula of almost all of the four-dimensional NUT-charged spacetimes. As an excellent consequence, the famous Bekenstein-Hawking one-quarter area-entropy relation can be naturally restored not only in the Lorentzian sector and but also in the Euclidian counterpart of the generic Taub-NUT-type spacetimes without imposing any constraint condition. However, only purely electric-charged cases in the four-dimensional Einstein-Maxwell gravity theory with a NUT charge have been addressed there. In this paper, we shall follow the simple, systematic way proposed in that article to further investigate the dyonic NUT-charged case. It is shown that the standard thermodynamic relations continue to hold true provided that no new secondary charge is added, however, the so-obtained electrostatic and magneto-static potentials are not coincident with those computed via the standard method. To rectify this inconsistence, a simple strategy is provided by further introducing two additional secondary hairs: Q_N=QN and P_N=PN, together with their thermodynamical conjugate potentials, so that the first law and Bekenstein-Smarr mass formula are still satisfied.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.