Paper detail

Consistent evaluation of continuum scale properties of Graphene

We handshake statistical mechanics with continuum mechanics to develop a methodology for consistent evaluation of the continuum scale properties of graphene. The scope is kept limited to elastic modulus, $E$, which has been reported to vary between 0.912 TPa to 7 TPa, Poisson's ratio, $ν$, which has been reported to vary from being negative to a value as large as 0.46, and effective thickness, $q$, whose value varies between 0.75 Åto 3.41 Å. Such a large scatter arises due to inconsistent evaluation of these properties and making assumptions that may not be valid at atomistic scales. Our methodology combines three separate methods -- uniaxial tension, equibiaxial tension, and flexural out-of-plane free vibrations of simply supported sheets, which, when used in tandem in MD, can provide consistent values of $E, ν$ and $q$. The only assumption made in the present study is the validity of the continuum scale thin plate vibration equation to represent the free vibrations of a long graphene sheet. Our results suggest that -- (i) graphene is auxetic with its Poisson's ratio increasing with increasing temperature, (ii) with increasing temperature, $E$ decreases, and (iii) the effective thickness increases with temperature.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.