Paper detail

Consistent estimation of the proportion of false nulls and FDR for adaptive multiple testing Normal means under weak dependence

We consider multiple testing means of many dependent Normal random variables that do not necessarily follow a joint Normal distribution. Under weak dependence, we show the uniform consistency of proportion estimators that are constructed as solutions to Lebesgue-Stieltjes equations for the setting of a point, bounded and one-sided null, respectively, and characterize via the index of weak dependence the sparsest proportion these estimators can consistently estimate. On the other hand, under a principal correlation structure and employing a suitable definition of p-value for composite null hypotheses, we show that three key empirical processes induced by a single-step multiple testing procedure (MTP) satisfy the strong law of large numbers for testing each of the three types of nulls. Further, under this structure and for testing a point null and a one-sided null respectively, we construct an adaptive single-step MTP that employs a proportion estimator mentioned earlier, and show that the false discovery proportion of this procedure satisfies the weak law of large numbers and hence consistently estimates the false discovery rate of the procedure. In addition, we report some findings on the estimators of Jin and of Meinshausen and Rice of the proportion of false nulls in the critically and very sparse regimes under weak dependence and model misspecifications, respectively.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.