Paper detail

Consensus for the Fip35 folding mechanism?

Recent advances in computational power and simulation programs finally delivered the first examples of reversible folding for small proteins with an all-atom description. But having at hand the atomistic details of the process did not lead to a straightforward interpretation of the mechanism. For the case of the Fip35 WW-domain where multiple long trajectories of 100 μs are available from D. E. Shaw Research, different interpretations emerged. Some of those are in clear contradiction with each other while others are in qualitative agreement. Here, we present a network-based analysis of the same data by looking at the local fluctuations of conventional order parameters for folding. We found that folding occurs through two major pathways, one almost four times more populated than the other. Each pathway involves the formation of an intermediate with one of the two hairpins in a native configuration. The quantitative agreement of our results with a state-of-the-art reaction coordinate optimization procedure as well as qualitative agreement with other Markov-state-models and different simulation schemes provides strong evidence for a multiple folding pathways scenario with the presence of intermediates.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.