Paper detail

Consensus based phase connectivity identification for distribution network with limited observability

The mitigation of distribution network (DN) unbalance and the use of single-phase flexibility for congestion mitigation requires accurate phase connection information, which is often not available. For a large DN, the naive phase identification proposed in the majority of the prior works using a single voltage reference does not scale well for a multi-feeder DN. We present a consensus algorithm-based phase identification mechanism which uses multiple three-phase reference points to improve the prediction of phases. Due to the absence of real measurements for a real-suburban German DN, the algorithms are developed and evaluated over synthetic data using a digital twin. To utilize strongly correlated measurements, the DN is clustered into zones. We observe those reference measurements located in the same zone as the single-phase consumer leads to accurate prediction of DN phases. Four consensus algorithms are developed and compared. Using numerical results, we recommend the most robust phase identification mechanism. In our evaluation, measurement error, and the impact of the neutral conductor are also assessed. We assume limited DN observability and apply our findings to a German DN without smart meters, but only less than 8% of nodes have measurement boxes along with single-phase consumers with a home energy management system. Voltage time series for 1 month (hourly sampled) is utilized. The numerical results indicate that for 1% accuracy class measurement, the phase connectivity of 308 out of 313 single-phase consumers in a German DN can be identified. Further, we also propose metrics quantifying the goodness of the phase identification. The phase identification framework based on consensus algorithms for DN zones is scalable for large DN and robust towards measurement errors as the estimation is not dependent on a single measurement point.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.