Paper detail

Conic Formation in Presence of Faulty Robots

Pattern formation is one of the most fundamental problems in distributed computing, which has recently received much attention. In this paper, we initiate the study of distributed pattern formation in situations when some robots can be \textit{faulty}. In particular, we consider the well-established \textit{look-compute-move} model with oblivious, anonymous robots. We first present lower bounds and show that any deterministic algorithm takes at least two rounds to form simple patterns in the presence of faulty robots. We then present distributed algorithms for our problem which match this bound, \textit{for conic sections}: in at most two rounds, robots form lines, circles and parabola tolerating $f=2,3$ and $4$ faults, respectively. For $f=5$, the target patterns are parabola, hyperbola and ellipse. We show that the resulting pattern includes the $f$ faulty robots in the pattern of $n$ robots, where $n \geq 2f+1$, and that $f < n < 2f+1$ robots cannot form such patterns. We conclude by discussing several relaxations and extensions.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.