Paper detail

Confusing and Detecting ML Adversarial Attacks with Injected Attractors

Many machine learning adversarial attacks find adversarial samples of a victim model ${\mathcal M}$ by following the gradient of some attack objective functions, either explicitly or implicitly. To confuse and detect such attacks, we take the proactive approach that modifies those functions with the goal of misleading the attacks to some local minimals, or to some designated regions that can be easily picked up by an analyzer. To achieve this goal, we propose adding a large number of artifacts, which we called $attractors$, onto the otherwise smooth function. An attractor is a point in the input space, where samples in its neighborhood have gradient pointing toward it. We observe that decoders of watermarking schemes exhibit properties of attractors and give a generic method that injects attractors from a watermark decoder into the victim model ${\mathcal M}$. This principled approach allows us to leverage on known watermarking schemes for scalability and robustness and provides explainability of the outcomes. Experimental studies show that our method has competitive performance. For instance, for un-targeted attacks on CIFAR-10 dataset, we can reduce the overall attack success rate of DeepFool to 1.9%, whereas known defense LID, FS and MagNet can reduce the rate to 90.8%, 98.5% and 78.5% respectively.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.