Paper detail

Confrontation of Double-Inflationary Models with Observations

We consider double-inflationary models with two noninteracting scalar fields, a light scalar field $ϕ_l$ with potential $\frac{1}{2}m_l^2ϕ_l^2$ and a heavy scalar field $ϕ_h$ with potential $\fracλ{n}ϕ_h^n$ with $n=2,4$. CDM with the initial spectrum of adiabatic perturbations produced in these models is compared with observations. These models contain two more free parameters than the standard CDM model with an initial scale-invariant spectrum. We normalize our spectra to COBE DMR and compare the predictions with observations on the biasing factor, large-scale peculiar velocities, quasar and galaxy formation and the Stromlo-APM counts-in-cells analysis. The model with $n=4$ is excluded by the data while for the $n=2$ model, taking cosmic variance into account, a small window of parameters compatible with observations is found.

preprint1994arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.