Researcher profile

P. Peter

P. Peter contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

astro-ph gr-qc hep-lat hep-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - Baseline

5works

0followers

4topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2009arXiv

Observing alternatives to inflation

We discuss the possibility that the inflationary paradigm, undoubtfully today's best framework to understand all the present cosmological data, may still have some viable challengers. The underlying idea for such discussions is that although inflation already passed quite a large number of tests, indeed enough to make it part of the so-called ``standard model'' of cosmology, it has always been through indirect measurements: there is not a chance that we may ever directly check its validity, and therefore, in order to assert its factuality with increasing level of confidence, it is required that we compare its predictions not only to observations, but also to as many contenders as possible. Among other categories of possible models, we wish to put the emphasis in particular on bouncing cosmologies that, however not as complete as the inflation paradigm might be, could still represent a reasonnable way of explaining the current data. Hopefully, future data will be able to discriminate between these various sets of theories.

preprint2001arXiv

Evidence against or for topological defects in the BOOMERanG data ?

The recently released BOOMERanG data was taken as ``contradicting topological defect predictions''. We show that such a statement is partly misleading. Indeed, the presence of a series of acoustic peaks is perfectly compatible with a non-negligible topological defects contribution. In such a mixed perturbation model (inflation and topological defects) for the source of primordial fluctuations, the natural prediction is a slightly lower amplitude for the Doppler peaks, a feature shared by many other purely inflationary models. Thus, for the moment, it seems difficult to rule out these models with the current data.

preprint1999arXiv

Bound states in monopoles: sources for UHECR ?

Bound states in monopoles are studied through a simplified, Witten-like model. As the overall structure is determined in full details, it is shown in particular that only those states having a vanishing angular momentum are allowed; for those, the energy spectrum is derived numerically and an approximation is set up that allows an easy description in terms of wavefunctions, usefull for further applications. The monopoles are then proposed as candidates of ultra high energy cosmic rays, an hypothesis that should soon be testable through the Pierre Auger Observatory.

preprint1999arXiv

Lorentz gauge fixing and the Gribov problem: the fermion correlator in lattice compact QED with Wilson fermions

For the Lorentz gauge the influence of Gribov copies on the fermion propagator is investigated in quenched lattice compact QED. In the Coulomb phase zero-momentum modes of the gauge fields are shown to be the main reason for a significant deviation from ordinary perturbation theory.

preprint1994arXiv

Confrontation of Double-Inflationary Models with Observations

We consider double-inflationary models with two noninteracting scalar fields, a light scalar field $ϕ_l$ with potential $\frac{1}{2}m_l^2ϕ_l^2$ and a heavy scalar field $ϕ_h$ with potential $\fracλ{n}ϕ_h^n$ with $n=2,4$. CDM with the initial spectrum of adiabatic perturbations produced in these models is compared with observations. These models contain two more free parameters than the standard CDM model with an initial scale-invariant spectrum. We normalize our spectra to COBE DMR and compare the predictions with observations on the biasing factor, large-scale peculiar velocities, quasar and galaxy formation and the Stromlo-APM counts-in-cells analysis. The model with $n=4$ is excluded by the data while for the $n=2$ model, taking cosmic variance into account, a small window of parameters compatible with observations is found.